This quantity examines cinematic representations of historic Greek ladies from the nation-states of fable and heritage. It discusses how those girl figures have been resurrected at the huge display through various filmmakers in the course of diverse ancient moments, and have been accordingly embedded inside of a story which served a variety of reasons.
Read Online or Download Ancient Greek Women in Film (Classical Presences) PDF
Similar film books
Reviewed by way of Carl Plantinga, Calvin College
Berys Gaut's very good new ebook, A Philosophy of Cinematic artwork, is a strength to be reckoned with within the philosophy of cinema, a subfield of aesthetics that has lately visible a flurry of scholarly curiosity and booklet. Writing on cinema by way of philosophers dates again a minimum of to Hugo Munsterberg, a colleague of William James at Harvard collage, and his 1916 The Photoplay: A mental examine. Analytic aestheticians, with a couple of exceptions, had till the previous few a long time been reluctant to take in the topic of cinema (let on my own its artistically suspect more youthful sibling, television), who prefer to check the extra conventional high-quality arts. because the twentieth Century marched on, this resistance turned more and more anachronistic. Noël Carroll, George Wilson, and Gregory Currie started publishing books at the philosophy of movie within the later Nineteen Eighties and the Nineties, and diverse different philosophers grew to become their cognizance to cinema in addition. this present day a number of very good books and anthologies at the philosophy and concept of cinema can be found, and the subject has develop into the most lively and interesting parts of aesthetics.
Gaut's ebook seems to be as one of those second-wave philosophy of cinema, and threads its manner among the debates of the prior 3 a long time, conscientiously describing the problems of rivalry. even though Gaut's positions on a number of concerns increase critical questions (as such a lot philosophical positions will), its contributions are many, no longer least of that are the readability, potency, and effort of the writing and pondering, the clever and insightful discussions of specific movies while the topic warrants it, and Gaut's familiarity with either electronic cinema and games, the latter of which he considers to be a sort of cinema -- interactive cinema. The book's primary contributions, in my view, are 3 in quantity: (1) it offers a transparent evaluate of some of the salient matters within the philosophy of cinema, including Gaut's forcefully argued positions at the correct debates; (2) it includes refined discussions of the consequences of advancements in electronic cinema and games for cinema concept; and (3) it defends the beleaguered concept of medium specificity in a few of its varieties, therefore reaffirming the significance of the explicit features of the medium for cinema thought and criticism.
Before going any longer it'd be clever to spot Gaut's specific manner of discussing cinema. For Gaut, cinema is the medium of relocating pictures. given that relocating photographs are available many alternative forms, Gaut distinguishes among conventional celluloid-based photographic cinema, electronic cinema, lively cinema, and digital cinema (television). the concept relocating photos lie on the middle of the medium isn't really a brand new one; different students have proposed that photographic motion pictures, animations, and electronic media might be grouped lower than the umbrella time period "moving photo media," and that "moving photograph studies" will be an invaluable rubric to explain the sphere of educational learn encompassing the learn of such relocating photos and linked kinds of communique and artwork. but Gaut's thought that the relocating snapshot media be known as "cinema" is novel, in that "cinema" has heretofore been linked to conventional photographic films, the note having a nineteenth century consider deriving from its origins in that ground-breaking invention of the Lumiére brothers, the cinématographe.
Since one of many pursuits of philosophy is to advertise conceptual readability, one sees the price of calling the medium "cinema," and deciding upon different types of cinema lower than this vast rubric. The terminology is stipulative, notwithstanding, and its uptake within the broader group depending on the negotiation of a number of political landmines, now not least of that is the unlikelihood that game and/or tv students will glance kindly on conceptualizing their selected media as types of cinema. One envisions a tv student archly suggesting that conventional cinema be thought of a sort of tv (photochemical tv? ), or the online game student insisting that games represent a brand new medium separate altogether from cinema. I ensue to love Gaut's terminology, yet now not every person will.
In the e-book Gaut truly information the salient concerns that philosophers and picture theorists have to date grappled with. What units this ebook aside is Gaut's cautious realization to how the previous debates approximately conventional cinema relate to new different types of cinema, and particularly electronic cinema and interactive cinema (video games). whereas those discussions make the booklet specially helpful and fairly modern, one wonders why digital cinema (television) is nearly thoroughly ignored.
In the 1st bankruptcy Gaut turns to Roger Scruton's argument opposed to taking images and cinema as paintings varieties simply because as photographic media, they checklist what's in entrance of the digicam instantly and therefore can't show suggestion. One may query even if Scruton's arguments want be taken heavily any more, and certainly, Gaut does summarily reject them. alongside the best way, even if, Gaut offers a few attention-grabbing discussions of Rudolph Arnheim's idea of movie and on alterations among analog and electronic images. the second one bankruptcy examines no matter if movie is a language (Gaut claims that it isn't) and discusses the character and kinds of realism in either conventional and electronic cinema. Gaut the following argues, contra Kendall Walton, that images should not obvious, for the reason that in seeing a photo the sunshine rays emanating from the article photographed don't go at once into our eyes. All pictures, either conventional and cinematic, are opaque.
In the 3rd bankruptcy Gaut vehemently opposes the auteur thought, or the idea that one individual, mostly the film's director, may be thought of to be the "author" of the movie, and as a substitute argues for a number of authorship when it comes to such a lot video clips. He additionally discusses those matters relating to electronic and interactive cinema. In "Understanding Cinema," bankruptcy four, Gaut rejects intentionalism as a idea of interpretation of collaborative artforms. He additionally rejects movie theorist David Bordwell's constructivisim in prefer of what Gaut calls "detectivism. " This prepares the way in which for his "patchwork theory" of movie interpretation, which holds that a number of components determine into settling on the proper interpretation of a movie, of which the intentions of the makers are just one. In illustrating his patchwork conception, Gaut presents a desirable demonstration of the patchwork concept in perform in his dialogue of Akira Kurosawa's Rashomon.
In bankruptcy five Gaut discusses cinema narration, picking out and rejecting 3 types of implicit cinematic narrators, and arguing that merely particular voice-over narrators needs to be stated within the cinema. alongside the way in which Gaut presents a great account of significant variations among movie and literature, an account that serves as proof for his rivalry that medium-specificity has a job to play within the philosophy of cinema. eventually during this bankruptcy, Gaut additionally turns to interactive narration, that's, to how we should always ponder narration in interactive media reminiscent of video games.
Emotion and identity are the topic of bankruptcy 6, within which Gaut explains the medium-specific ways in which cinema fosters emotional engagement, and defends the idea of "identification" from those that think of the idea that to be too obscure or ill-defined. Gaut reveals it curious that the majority cognitive and analytic theorists and philosophers have rejected the suggestion of id altogether as both careworn or too wide and ambiguous. Noël Carroll, for instance, has rejected identity since it ostensibly presumes a type of Vulcan mind-meld among viewers and personality. Gaut notes that the etymological root of "identification" is of "making identical," yet claims that the which means of a time period "is an issue of its use within the language" (255), now not in its etymology.
Fair sufficient, yet one wonders if Gaut's definition of id succeeds in opting for using the be aware in traditional language, in any other case stipulates a definition that Gaut claims to be extra distinct. Gaut defines identity as "imagining oneself in a character's situation" (258), and is going directly to distinguish among vast kinds of identity, imaginitive and empathic id. ingenious id can itself be subdivided into a variety of kinds, together with perceptual, affective, motivational, epistemic, useful, and maybe different kinds, counting on what element of the character's scenario the viewers imagines itself to be in. Empathic id, however, happens while one stocks a number of of the character's (fictional) feelings simply because one has projected oneself into the character's scenario. One may possibly ask why we should always take empathy to be id in any respect, instead of an emotional reaction to identity, if identity is outlined as an act of the mind's eye instead of a type of emotional reaction. additional dialogue may take us too some distance afield, yet there are different questions that may be requested of Gaut's concept of identification.
This booklet will be noticeable partially as a problem to Noël Carroll's sustained critique of media specificity. therefore Gaut's concluding bankruptcy affirms 3 medium-specificity claims that Gaut holds to be not just right, yet invaluable for a formal appreciation of the cinema. He distinguishes among a medium and paintings shape, describes how media might be nested inside of one another, and says that medium specificity has much less to do with distinctiveness than it does with what he calls differential houses. This bankruptcy additionally serves as an invaluable precis of the details of the ebook, within which Gaut illustrates every one of his 3 medium-specificity claims by means of reminding us of the conclusions he got here to prior within the publication, and of the way they illustrate particular features of the medium of relocating pictures.
Berys Gaut's total success in A Philosophy of Cinematic paintings is monstrous, between different issues, for his persuasive argument for medium specificity, and for his recognition to new different types of cinema. This complete ebook is vital within the library of somebody drawn to the philosophy of cinema.
Copyright © 2004 Notre Dame Philosophical studies
The acclaimed director of Mishima, American Gigolo, challenging center, Blue Collar, Cat humans additionally the screenwriter for Taxi driving force, Paul Schrader right here analyzes the movie sort of 3 nice directors—Yasajiro Ozu, Robert Bresson, Carl Dreyer—and posits a standard dramatic language through those artists from divergent cultures.
Brutal Intimacy is the 1st booklet to discover the interesting motion pictures of latest France, starting from mainstream style spectaculars to arthouse experiments, and from wildly well known hits to movies that intentionally alienate the viewer. Twenty-first-century France is an enormous resource of foreign cinema--diverse and dynamic, embattled but prosperous--a nationwide cinema supplying anything for everybody.
Serving as a realistic guide at the craft of dramatic writing for movie, this booklet specializes in seven crucial instruments for the screenwriter. that includes the production, improvement and building of an unique screenplay from begin to end, it deals readers an image of ways to use those instruments on their lonesome scripts.
- Inside the Historical Film
- Terror and Everyday Life: Singular Moments in the History of the Horror Film
- The Films of Joel and Ethan Coen
- Spielberg: The Man, the Movies, the Mythology
- The Films of Oliver Reed
Additional resources for Ancient Greek Women in Film (Classical Presences)
In general on pepla, see Günsberg (2005: 97–132), Nisbet (2006: 47–55), Pomeroy (2008: 29–59), Nikoloutsos (2013), and Paul and Pomeroy (both this volume). 13 Dyer (1997: 145–83), MacKinnon (2002), Günsberg (2005: 102, 130–1), Turner (2009). , Shahabudin (2009) and Pomeroy (this volume). See Günsberg (2005: 103) for the colour associations. 15 Günsberg (2005: 101–4), Pomeroy (2008: 33), Nikoloutsos (2013: 264–72). 16 ‘Helen of Troy particularly shines as a thoughtful, literate screenplay’ (Nisbet 2006: 33).
For the ﬁrst ﬁve and a half minutes, while the overture is playing, the screen displays a still image of an elaborate interior hallway, the spectator gazing down its centre. Relief grifﬁn sculptures adorn both inner walls, while through a broad open doorway, on a raised platform, three Doric columns recede along each side. 57 The camera’s perspective converges on a strange sculpture in the back, which Camille Paglia calls an inappropriately Hindu-like image (1997: 189), and which might suggest to some audience members the Trojan priest Laocoon’s struggle with snakes sent by the gods.
5 PMG) both use xanthos once to describe Helen. Although the word is generally translated as ‘blonde’, it is rendered as ‘tawny’ when referring to lions, and ‘red-haired’ when describing Menelaus. In modern Greek it connotes light chestnut brown rather than Nordic blonde. Scholars have long recognized that ancient Greek colour terms referred less to hue than to the quality of light. 32 While the ancient literature suggests some privileging of the fair-haired, it tends to leave physical details to the imagination of the viewer (cf.